Meeting with the Dutch delegation

It came as an surprise: the Dutch delegation (for me at that moment: man, formally clothed, speaking like politicians who are very busy negotiating) wants to meet with Dutch NGO’s! I thought that they where too busy negotiation and didn’t have time to inform NGO’s about their achievements and even consult them. The meeting was planned on Friday 11th at 01.30 pm in a negotiation room of the Dutch delegation. Opposite of the room, the Holland Climate House was situated. In contrast, in the Holland Climate House everyone was welcome to join presentations and browse some flyers. The Netherlands rely wanted to show off with what their doing to fight climate change. Universities and companies could present their solutions here. But what was achieved by the Dutch delegation until now?

We entered the negotiation room with some other representatives of NGO’s (e.g. JMA, Milieudefensie, Wetlands International and Oxfam Novib) and two negotiators. Not surprisingly the last were men in formal clothing. In addition, a student represented youth in the Netherlands and a women of Oxfam Novib seemed to be a member of the delegation. Unfortunately the room had no roof and neighboring countries’ noise caused that some questions could barely be understood. The delegation especially wanted to know which topics where important for the NGO’s and what should be achieved. Most of the questions where regarded the billions of Euros which countries should set aside to fight climate change. These funds should be additional and thus not being taken from the current development aid. It was clear that very little could be achieved without participation of countries like the VS, China, India and Russia. In short most answers ended like: “On condition that China will participate.”

Unfortunately the members could no say anything about advancements made on REDD. We had to speak to Bas Clabbers who was the REDD-specialist. The only way: catch him in front of one of the many negotiation rooms. Hopeless, but this is the life of a reporter… We where unsuccessful.

The meeting was far from a waste of time. It was very interesting to see how negotiators work and in what terms they speak. Furthermore, it was nice to hear of the advancements there are with consultation of youth in such summits. The Netherlands, as one of the seven countries with a youth representative, seems the have stimulate this consultation widely. Even we got an invitation to run for being the next representative.

Bas Tinhout

two worlds

Impressions of the my second day in Hopenhagen (11th of december):

Millions of busy business people, billions of laptops, NGO-representatives which don´t have a clue about their statement to REDD and always have to call for somebody, 4 USB-Sticks and Global Forest Cover Loss Poster. Some of the people behind the stand even had more fun with selling necklets than giving an opinion about REDD.

To be honest – I feel a bit confused about what I saw today. You really can feel the huge difference seperating the Bella Center from the Klimaforum, seperating the economics from the environmentalists, seperating decision-making governmental representatives from decision-carrying non-governmental representatives.
What shall I think? Aren´t we one world – don´t we have one world „to save“?
I wish the flood action tomorrow will succeed.

Tini

Overview of GFC and other forest-related (KF) events at the Climate Summit

See 'news' at the GFC website for an overview of Global Forest Coalition and other forest-related (KF) events at the Climate Summit in Copenhagen

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

The heat is on

Two weeks before 'Copenhagen'...

Test Copenhagen

Test test